Showing posts with label John Adams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Adams. Show all posts

Thursday, December 5, 2019

The Middle Has Never Felt So Dangerous

"The middle path is the way to wisdom." - Rumi
Some days, some times, seem darker and more menacing than other days. The hate filling the atmosphere of the present moments is a bit disturbing. I keep searching through the Left and Right rhetorical fog for the wisdom and the soundness of action and decision with regard to the application of experience, knowledge, and good judgment. However, I only hear and see partisan soundbites and outright distortions of truth. Or omitted and edited versions of talking-point opinions by the talking heads of journalists, commentators, movement-leaders, or politicians. 

Alas, I suspect I expect too much.

I find it is now very difficult to impossible to walk the middle path, or as I have always believed, the political center. I define that political center as an outlook or specific position that involves accepting or supporting the balance of social equality with social hierarchy. Taking this position makes me oppose political changes which would result in a significant shift of society strongly to either Leftists or Right-wing zealots. Tyranny for citizens by the proposed extremes of the Left or the Right.

These are the times that John Adams wrote about where "In politics the middle way is none at all." Similarly, a German poet once wrote, “In times of extremes, the middle path is deadly.” So why do I want to walk the middle path so badly? Perhaps it helps me to be kind to everyone, to be empathetic, to look at the human condition with compassion in a nonjudgemental way.

However, that middle path has never been protected by the promotion of milquetoast policies everyone already agrees on, it’s protected by taking the time to understand and defend foundational principles such as free speech, open and transparent inquiry, and due process. Now, when forced to defend those foundational principles, we are asked (or shouted down) to shut-up and tow a radical left or right line.

When did having opposing opinions become unacceptable? I am beginning to understand now why people find caves in Idaho to live in. Or become Anarchists.

I used to believe what Rumi said but these days it seems like the German poet and John Adams understood it with what I find uncomfortable correctness.

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

What the Founding Fathers Said

“The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”― George Washington and John Adams.

Both of the above founding fathers, in the Treaty of Tripoli signed in 1787, shared this belief about where this country, the young United States of America, stood in reflecting what it stood for on the world stage. What does that quote mean to us today when we face so many issues that change long-held beliefs and the right of all citizens to be protected by the concept of social justice for all in our country? 

Around 1787 History Lesson: The United States was battling the unsettling and dangerous threat of the Barbary Pirates. These pirates, or privateers as they were also known, came from the Barbary States of Algiers, Tunis, Tripoli, and other small states, but were under the sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire. Their predation of American shipping interests extended throughout the Mediterranean, south along the West African seaboard, into South American waters, and to Iceland in the North Atlantic. The treaty was designed to address ending piracy on American shipping on the high seas, and this treaty passed unanimously in the Senate (only the third such unanimous vote of the first 339 recorded votes in the early Senate, and I am only guessing that those senators read the whole treaty before voting on it). In fact, official records show that the entire treaty was read aloud on the Senate floor, and copies were printed for each and every Senator. 

What do you think the founders meant by this? I don't think they were just pulling a fast one. They came to the colonies to escape religious persecution, and created a republic. Yes a republic, which is a form of government in which power resides in elected individuals representing the citizen body and government leaders exercise power according to the rule of law. This republic was created so that it protected religion while also acknowledging that the government would remain secular, protecting each and every belief equally (each and every citizen) and not endorse any one religion over another. This also includes the freedom of choice of whether or not to choose a religion at all.  

In fact, it was President Thomas Jefferson who later wrote (to a Baptist church group in 1802), "The First Amendment has erected as a wall of separation between Church and State." 

And to handle this concept fairly, not everyone agreed with this perspective. James McHenry, the Secretary of War, protested the language of the treaty. "[He said] at the time, [The Senate] ought never to have ratified the treaty alluded to, with the declaration that 'the government of the United States, is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.'What else is it founded on? This act always appeared to me like trampling upon the cross. I do not recollect that Barlow (Joel Barlow was the United States consul-general to the Barbary States who handled the translation of the treaty from Arabic to English) was even reprimanded for this outrage upon the government and religion."

I for one feel safe knowing the historical perspectives and having the opportunity to question motives in their entirety whenever our government gets into the process of deciding what we should believe. But we are blessed by the gift of having the choice of what to believe, and that the constitution gives us an opportunity to entirely respect the beliefs of others. Entirely! This does not mean to condone behavior that is hurtful and mean and destructive to the lives of any United States citizen. We are all created equal and need equal treatment in our country. Apply the golden rule. Anyone can apply that rule, it is not exclusive to any group. You don't even need a religion.

Please revisit and read what the founders of this great nation wrote, don't take my word  or what the spin-doctors spin. Before believing anything you hear or read, try critically looking at it, and then decide. We all deserve to give ourselves that gift.